Why Android?!

In 2013 Android captured 70% of the phones in Europe. And then rolled astronomical numbers so Android came to realize approximately 1.5 million devices activated daily and this means that by 2013 we will have more than a billion Android phone enabled. Not only did that, but that Android yet another statistic proves that 80% of phones around the world are running Android. Of course, all of these numbers demonstrate explicitly that Android is controlled and almost entirely on the reins of the competition, the talk about a system dominated by 80% on the phone market sold, and the rest is only 20% of the  iOS system and Windows Phone 8 and BlackBerry 10 and FireFox OS and Asha system  and Symbian and other regulations, it is certainly a huge number, proves the dominance of Android on the rest of the systems, but do these figures mean that the entire system and lacks nothing, or it is impossible to defeat?

Everything depends its success on the large number of users, when we talk about the Android system - which is the focus of our conversation - we find that success is caused by the large number of users, and we talk about other things as examples, Let YouTube application, no one also deny the success of YouTube, I think that everyone of us is not free day of surfing YouTube clips, but also take the iPhone as another example,Google search engine too, and we have the windows system, and there are of course many things you will find that searched. Let us return to the Android system , surely Android is more user system is by far and vast for the rest, but that does not mean that Android full by all standards, once put specific matters do not exist in the rest of the systems at the same time interest to the user and assist in the use of the system as he wants to get you the access key. This is what happened it Android, but ...

In 2007 the iPhone was released , however that there are a lot of smart phones before the iPhone, but it was the most widespread and best-selling, and the reason for the success of the iPhone in addition to the name of a company the size of Apple resonate widely Val iPhone is McCann wishes of the user at the time. The Windows mobile system quality is not the current system of Windows phone 8 and this is something that make iPhone users are attracted to the system because it provided stable, simple and practical at the same time. IPhone is still controlled until 2010, specifically after the Galaxy S, I do not deny that the phones at the time were pretty even in 2010, HTC was already offering excellent phones, but are not the primary factor is the user. But after the release of Samsung Galaxy S was a leap to Android, but why? I do not say that the Galaxy S was a leap through the specifications, but Samsung knew the market situation at the time,then it 

take advantage of things that are not present in the iPhone 4 and abundance in the phone Galaxy S, the most important is the price, the user usually sees the performance of the Galaxy S compared Pal iPhone lucrative deal, and this McCann also reduces HTC. There are also several other reasons why the Galaxy S leap for Android phones which is marketing, The Samsung focused marketing differently, yes, is not up to the current level of marketing, but it was better than HTC in this area. After the phone Galaxy SII to transfer that Samsung entered the telephone strong on the contrary Galaxy S and yet offers excellent performance, for marketing in the phone Galaxy SII was already leap wide range of Galaxy S, do not forget the System Agent for the success of the phone, I can say it is an equation, with the Galaxy SII phone  spread Android, with the android phone has spread Galaxy SII. But the success of income-based phone? Android by the Galaxy S it provides the user's needs, but it is not available, who publishes a phone system, it must be a strong Hardware and at the same time must reach the idea that you have to do with phone MATRADE people through advertising. Most ads focused on the phone and not on the system but with the acquisition of the phone, users knew that the phone already has an excellent system, Most users want Android because it provides the user with liberty and the same process in use, the system of the iOS was not the flexibility that characterized the system Android.

With the Android system provider was to the user but lacks the phone, which provides hardware and strong company that will be able to deliver Android excellent reputation.

How did the Engadget site and how they arrived to the article you are reading right now? The answer collectively by the Google search engine. Google has a platform of applications associated with each project that will help to continue. Many of us have an e-mail from Gmail, though it will be your YouTube account, and you have an account in Google+ - but were not used by - and your YouTube will be linked to your account on Google+, I want to say that all the applications Google associated with your Gmail, even system Android, Vhsapk in a phone Android is your Gmail account and therefore all things in the phone will be synchronized with your account by your Gmail account and you can browse on your account whatever of his regime, and therefore the use of Android will be linked to that you have an account in Gmail or not, and usually will you have a Gmail account. But Maalaqh in Google projects including Android? That you have something that already exists and to use the thing associated with this thing that you have, this will save a lot of time. You own account and not the phone and this McCann provided by Android, suppose you moved from one Android phone to another, is that you're a new person? But you're not the same old person as long as your account on your new and old, and this will provide regain some of your files, contacts, and applications that you've purchased from the store as well as the images that you have already lifting on Google+ and a lot of things. I do not say that Android is the only one that has this feature, but that the system of Windows phone also possessed, Vhatvk will be Mterbt platform Xbox owned - if I owned actually - and will also be linked system of windows on your computer, as well as files and data in the office will be Mrepettth account in the Sky Drive either on your phone or computer. But when we come to system iOS as an example, we find that the phone the iPhone is linked to your account in itunes but it will not have the full features, if not your computer running Mac OS and therefore we can not be likened Apple Backlinks or Microsoft as the platform of applications embody as a base to launch projects that usually do not fail, because it is linked with the rest of the company's applications.

When we talk about an important aspect which side applications, we find that Android is a more regulations that will attract developers, not because the development environment in Android is the best, not because the system Android gives full Ahkiet developer, but when you talk about the system accounts for approximately 80% of phones This is what dreams applications developer, and this is what helped to improve the Google play store recently. Developer Platform Android may suffer from the problem is that the application is not encrypted, which means that it is easy to copy applications paid and downloaded free of charge or sold at a cheaper price, and this is may bother the developer a lot Unfortunately that version Android 4.1 was supposed to be encrypted applications, But Google has declined in the last minute. Conclusion that the Android system is not the best in terms of the development environment, but what made Google play succeeds in that it provides ease of application deployment and speed of arrival of the store, and the main factor is the users. If we have noted in the past that the developer usually depends on the development of programs to fit the system Android 2.3 or higher, because the Android 2.3 system is the most widely used in that period, but with the above system Android 4.1 in terms of number of users, has become more developers to develop applications to fit the Android system 4.1 and the greed In the multitude of users, and also improve the development environment in the latest versions of Android.

Android system is a open-source systems, in the sense that you can access the system files and modify them as you like. In addition to the system of the Android system is free, which means that any company soon have a phone full but lacks Software  an use Android as a strong and at the same time free, this is not, but also that you can amendment on the system whatever you want and create a system for building a system Android , as is the case with the CyanogenMod team AOKP team also, and there are a lot of people who build Their own system Roms based on Android. But how it helped on the success of Android? Large companies aspire to be distinctive, as well as Samsung, HTC, LG and others, when the system to have the amendment ore it so unique and make it as is Android name, but in terms of the interface and features is its special character. This is on large companies, but what about small businesses? I can say that a large percentage of small businesses are moving to Android because the system is free, which means they only buy pieces of the Interior and designs phone and system is Android and usually small companies trying to build a strong phone and at the lowest cost and at the same time cheap. Which means that the system is free and adjustable is attracting companies, whether large or emerging companies.

HTC and Samsung, LG, Huawei and ZTE Sony and OPPO and ..... I can not mention all the manufacturers on the system Android, but nevertheless the Beneficiary biggest one is the Samsung, I can not deny that the Android system Excellent is the best road from my point of view, but when we talk about the success rate of each company in the Android system very little even if the company offering the best products Samsung itself! Do not forget that Nokia interpreted the direction of the Windows phone 8 and leave the Android is the fear of the dominance of Samsung system Android, I do not deny that Nokia offers a masterpiece system, Windows phone 8, as well as HTC are other no less, but when we talk about the issue of profits, P Nokia is superior to the second reason is not entered in the yard where the company controls almost entirely Samsung. I liken Android as a way long, innervate walk it and full of contestants, and at the end of a giant monster that defeated can get a treasure! Analogy somewhat reminds me of games but nevertheless I think it is very appropriate to system like Android. In all, the experience of access to the Android system is open to all but getting to the end of the road is very difficult.

Per the beginning of the end. Kodak was the number one company in the field of cameras and in 2012 ended up for the sale of their own patents. I really do not find it odd that end Android within five years, but at the same time may continue for a longer period if there is no system that provides what provided by Android to the user, and not only that it provides what is missing system Android, as a strong security non-penetrating and without do without flexibility of the system, it is possible and strike a Linux system as an example. Also said that the system provides a safe and shop observer immune from malicious applications, which may disturb the normal user in the Android system. The system was attractive to all users at the same time attract software developers not only because the system has a tremendous amount of users, but in addition to this is an excellent system as a developmental environment. The future of Android might imagine some bright full In addition enhancements, but use thought of things that decrease the Android system are a few somewhat, and that the addition of any new feature in Android is not as easy as imagined other, administration system constitutes 80% of the mobile world may be difficult Any simple mistake could lead Android to the landing. So I think that Google planning in the next stage may be simple things to improve the system.